Rhetorics and realities of participation: the Ethiopian agricultural extension system and its participatory turns
Gerba Leta
Girma Kelboro
Kristof Van Assche
Till Stellmacher
Anna-Katharina Hornidge
Abstract
We present a context-sensitive perspective on participation in rural development, revolving around the reconstruction of unique sets of differences between rhetorics and realities. Using a theoretical frame inspired by the Evolutionary Governance Theory, we identify mechanisms of reinterpretation and delimitation of participation in the context of evolving rural governance. Through a detailed case study of the Ethiopian agricultural extension system, we observed that various path dependencies, interdependencies, and goal dependencies in the extension system but notably also in the embedding system of rural governance limit and shape farmers’ participation. It is argued that the precise difference between official state rhetoric and on-the-ground realities of participation become understandable through reconstruction of embedding governance paths, and that the difference is further defined by relating it to the way other key concepts in rural development are implemented: decentralization, self-governance, and agricultural extension itself. Mapping out these coevolving rhetorics and realities gives insights in real reform options, for extension in particular and rural governance in general. Our case findings show that despite numerous reforms in the agricultural extension system and a steady increase in the extension coverage with a huge number of extension workers (Development Agents), participatory approaches largely failed to meet farmers’ needs.
Leta G., Kelboro G., Van Assche K., Stellmacher T. and Hornidge A.-K. (2019) Rhetorics and realities of participation: the Ethiopian agricultural extension system and its participatory turns. Critical Policy Studies 14(4): 388-407. 10.1080/19460171.2019.1616212
@article{Leta2019,
Title = {Rhetorics and realities of participation: the Ethiopian agricultural extension system and its participatory turns},
Author = {Leta, Gerba and Kelboro, Girma and Van Assche, Kristof and Stellmacher, Till and Hornidge, Anna-Katharina},
Editor = {},
Journal = {Critical Policy Studies},
Year = {2019},
Pages = {388-407},
Volume = {14},
Doi = {10.1080/19460171.2019.1616212},
Abstract = {We present a context-sensitive perspective on participation in rural development, revolving around the reconstruction of unique sets of differences between rhetorics and realities. Using a theoretical frame inspired by the Evolutionary Governance Theory, we identify mechanisms of reinterpretation and delimitation of participation in the context of evolving rural governance. Through a detailed case study of the Ethiopian agricultural extension system, we observed that various path dependencies, interdependencies, and goal dependencies in the extension system but notably also in the embedding system of rural governance limit and shape farmers’ participation. It is argued that the precise difference between official state rhetoric and on-the-ground realities of participation become understandable through reconstruction of embedding governance paths, and that the difference is further defined by relating it to the way other key concepts in rural development are implemented: decentralization, self-governance, and agricultural extension itself. Mapping out these coevolving rhetorics and realities gives insights in real reform options, for extension in particular and rural governance in general. Our case findings show that despite numerous reforms in the agricultural extension system and a steady increase in the extension coverage with a huge number of extension workers (Development Agents), participatory approaches largely failed to meet farmers’ needs.},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Leta, Gerba
AU - Kelboro, Girma
AU - Van Assche, Kristof
AU - Stellmacher, Till
AU - Hornidge, Anna-Katharina
TI - Rhetorics and realities of participation: the Ethiopian agricultural extension system and its participatory turns
T2 - Critical Policy Studies
PY - 2019
SP - 388-407
VL - 14
DO - 10.1080/19460171.2019.1616212
AB - We present a context-sensitive perspective on participation in rural development, revolving around the reconstruction of unique sets of differences between rhetorics and realities. Using a theoretical frame inspired by the Evolutionary Governance Theory, we identify mechanisms of reinterpretation and delimitation of participation in the context of evolving rural governance. Through a detailed case study of the Ethiopian agricultural extension system, we observed that various path dependencies, interdependencies, and goal dependencies in the extension system but notably also in the embedding system of rural governance limit and shape farmers’ participation. It is argued that the precise difference between official state rhetoric and on-the-ground realities of participation become understandable through reconstruction of embedding governance paths, and that the difference is further defined by relating it to the way other key concepts in rural development are implemented: decentralization, self-governance, and agricultural extension itself. Mapping out these coevolving rhetorics and realities gives insights in real reform options, for extension in particular and rural governance in general. Our case findings show that despite numerous reforms in the agricultural extension system and a steady increase in the extension coverage with a huge number of extension workers (Development Agents), participatory approaches largely failed to meet farmers’ needs.
ER -
