Marine research increasingly requires early career researchers to translate knowledge across disciplinary, institutional, and societal boundaries, often under conditions of asymmetrical power and limited training. In response, many early career researchers intuitively employ objects such as maps, models, concepts, diagrams, or tools to support participation and shared understanding, while opportunities to reflect collectively on how and why these practices work remain limited. Drawing on boundary object theory and insights from cognitive science, this article conceptualizes such objects as cognitive and social mediators that enable shared sense-making without requiring consensus. It further argues that such objects are not neutral, and that their effectiveness depends on attention to power relations, framing, and positionality within inter- and transdisciplinary marine contexts. By articulating how and why boundary objects function, this article invites early career researchers to recognize and use boundary objects intentionally, offering practical, reflexive guidance for their use in inter- and transdisciplinary marine research. In doing so, it contributes to ongoing discussions on inter- and transdisciplinary marine training by foregrounding boundary objects as a legitimate practice and inviting more intentional and reflexive engagement with it in translating marine research across science, policy, and society.
Dziomba L. (2026) How To Do Things With Objects: Boundary Objects in Inter- and Transdisciplinary Marine Research. Ocean and Society 3. 10.17645/oas.12761
@article{Dziomba2026,
Title = {How To Do Things With Objects: Boundary Objects in Inter- and Transdisciplinary Marine Research},
Author = {Dziomba, Leonie},
Journal = {Ocean and Society},
Year = {2026},
Volume = {3},
Doi = {10.17645/oas.12761},
Abstract = {Marine research increasingly requires early career researchers to translate knowledge across disciplinary, institutional, and societal boundaries, often under conditions of asymmetrical power and limited training. In response, many early career researchers intuitively employ objects such as maps, models, concepts, diagrams, or tools to support participation and shared understanding, while opportunities to reflect collectively on how and why these practices work remain limited. Drawing on boundary object theory and insights from cognitive science, this article conceptualizes such objects as cognitive and social mediators that enable shared sense-making without requiring consensus. It further argues that such objects are not neutral, and that their effectiveness depends on attention to power relations, framing, and positionality within inter- and transdisciplinary marine contexts. By articulating how and why boundary objects function, this article invites early career researchers to recognize and use boundary objects intentionally, offering practical, reflexive guidance for their use in inter- and transdisciplinary marine research. In doing so, it contributes to ongoing discussions on inter- and transdisciplinary marine training by foregrounding boundary objects as a legitimate practice and inviting more intentional and reflexive engagement with it in translating marine research across science, policy, and society.},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Dziomba, Leonie
TI - How To Do Things With Objects: Boundary Objects in Inter- and Transdisciplinary Marine Research
T2 - Ocean and Society
PY - 2026
VL - 3
DO - 10.17645/oas.12761
AB - Marine research increasingly requires early career researchers to translate knowledge across disciplinary, institutional, and societal boundaries, often under conditions of asymmetrical power and limited training. In response, many early career researchers intuitively employ objects such as maps, models, concepts, diagrams, or tools to support participation and shared understanding, while opportunities to reflect collectively on how and why these practices work remain limited. Drawing on boundary object theory and insights from cognitive science, this article conceptualizes such objects as cognitive and social mediators that enable shared sense-making without requiring consensus. It further argues that such objects are not neutral, and that their effectiveness depends on attention to power relations, framing, and positionality within inter- and transdisciplinary marine contexts. By articulating how and why boundary objects function, this article invites early career researchers to recognize and use boundary objects intentionally, offering practical, reflexive guidance for their use in inter- and transdisciplinary marine research. In doing so, it contributes to ongoing discussions on inter- and transdisciplinary marine training by foregrounding boundary objects as a legitimate practice and inviting more intentional and reflexive engagement with it in translating marine research across science, policy, and society.
ER -
