A growing number of global ocean conflict studies over the last decade have set out to advance sustainability in the Anthropocene. Many of these research projects use multiple case studies to extract lessons for wider contexts. The methods used by these studies, and the extent to which their results have validity beyond the individual case study, often remain unclear. This paper explores the challenges in performing cross-case analysis within what we denote as case-based globally focussed sustainability projects (CB-GSPs) and indicates solutions by combining information from semi-structured interviews with leading scientists from eight CB-GSPs. We identify six distinct challenges that are common across these studies with regard to generating actionable knowledge through cross-case analysis. Based on these findings, we propose a set of best practice recommendations for scientists, project partners, and funders to co-produce actionable knowledge for global projects on ocean conflict.
Glaser M., Selim S.A., De la Cruz-Modino R., van Putten I., Canela S.A., Paytan A., Dutra L.X.C., Heck N., Narayan S., Sauer W., Boonstra W.J. and Snow B. (2023) Analysis across case-based global sustainability projects: an emerging challenge for ocean conflict research in the Anthropocene. MAST. Maritime studies/Maritime studies 22(4). 10.1007/s40152-023-00323-3
@article{Glaser2023,
Title = {Analysis across case-based global sustainability projects: an emerging challenge for ocean conflict research in the Anthropocene},
Author = {Glaser, Marion and Selim, Samiya Ahmed and De la Cruz-Modino, Raquel and van Putten, Ingrid and Canela, Shankar Aswani and Paytan, Adina and Dutra, Leo X.C. and Heck, Nadine and Narayan, Siddharth and Sauer, Warwick and Boonstra, Wiebren Johannes and Snow, Bernadette},
Editor = {},
Journal = {MAST. Maritime studies/Maritime studies},
Year = {2023},
Volume = {22},
Doi = {10.1007/s40152-023-00323-3},
Abstract = {A growing number of global ocean conflict studies over the last decade have set out to advance sustainability in the Anthropocene. Many of these research projects use multiple case studies to extract lessons for wider contexts. The methods used by these studies, and the extent to which their results have validity beyond the individual case study, often remain unclear. This paper explores the challenges in performing cross-case analysis within what we denote as case-based globally focussed sustainability projects (CB-GSPs) and indicates solutions by combining information from semi-structured interviews with leading scientists from eight CB-GSPs. We identify six distinct challenges that are common across these studies with regard to generating actionable knowledge through cross-case analysis. Based on these findings, we propose a set of best practice recommendations for scientists, project partners, and funders to co-produce actionable knowledge for global projects on ocean conflict.},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Glaser, Marion
AU - Selim, Samiya Ahmed
AU - De la Cruz-Modino, Raquel
AU - van Putten, Ingrid
AU - Canela, Shankar Aswani
AU - Paytan, Adina
AU - Dutra, Leo X.C.
AU - Heck, Nadine
AU - Narayan, Siddharth
AU - Sauer, Warwick
AU - Boonstra, Wiebren Johannes
AU - Snow, Bernadette
TI - Analysis across case-based global sustainability projects: an emerging challenge for ocean conflict research in the Anthropocene
T2 - MAST. Maritime studies/Maritime studies
PY - 2023
VL - 22
DO - 10.1007/s40152-023-00323-3
AB - A growing number of global ocean conflict studies over the last decade have set out to advance sustainability in the Anthropocene. Many of these research projects use multiple case studies to extract lessons for wider contexts. The methods used by these studies, and the extent to which their results have validity beyond the individual case study, often remain unclear. This paper explores the challenges in performing cross-case analysis within what we denote as case-based globally focussed sustainability projects (CB-GSPs) and indicates solutions by combining information from semi-structured interviews with leading scientists from eight CB-GSPs. We identify six distinct challenges that are common across these studies with regard to generating actionable knowledge through cross-case analysis. Based on these findings, we propose a set of best practice recommendations for scientists, project partners, and funders to co-produce actionable knowledge for global projects on ocean conflict.
ER -
