@article{Cinner2020,
Title = {Meeting fisheries, ecosystem function, and biodiversity goals in a human
dominated world},
Author = {Cinner, Joshua E. and Zamborain-Mason, Jessica and Gurney, Georgina G. and Graham, Nicholas A.J. and MacNeil, M. Aaron and Hoey, Andrew S. and Mora, Camilo and Villéger, Sébastien and Maire, Eva and McClanahan, Tim R. and Maina, Joseph M. and Kittinger, John N. and Hicks, Christina C. and D'agata, Stephanie and Huchery, Cindy and Barnes, Michele L. and Feary, David A. and Williams, Ivor D. and Kulbicki, Michel and Vigliola, Laurent and Wantiez, Laurent and Edgar, Graham J. and Stuart-Smith, Rick D. and Sandin, Stuart A. and Green, Alison L. and Beger, Maria and Friedlander, Alan M. and Wilson, Shaun K. and Brokovich, Eran and Brooks, Andrew J. and Cruz-Motta, Juan J. and Booth, David J. and Chabanet, Pascale and Tupper, Mark and Ferse, Sebastian C.A. and Sumaila, U. Rashid and Hardt, Marah J. and Mouillot, David},
Editor = {},
Journal = {Science},
Year = {2020},
Pages = {307-311},
Volume = {368},
Doi = {10.1126/science.aax9412},
Abstract = {The worldwide decline of coral reefs necessitates targeting management solutions that can sustain not only reefs but also the livelihoods of the millions of people who depend on them. Yet little is known about the context in which different reef management tools can help to achieve multiple social and ecological goals. Due to non-linearities in the likelihood of achieving combined fisheries, ecological function, and biodiversity goals along a gradient of human pressure, relatively small changes in the context where management is implemented could have dramatic implications on whether these goals are likely to be met or not. Critically, marine reserves and fisheries restrictions could provide substantial conservation benefits to the majority of reefs for fisheries and ecological function, but not biodiversity goals.},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Cinner, Joshua E.
AU - Zamborain-Mason, Jessica
AU - Gurney, Georgina G.
AU - Graham, Nicholas A.J.
AU - MacNeil, M. Aaron
AU - Hoey, Andrew S.
AU - Mora, Camilo
AU - Villéger, Sébastien
AU - Maire, Eva
AU - McClanahan, Tim R.
AU - Maina, Joseph M.
AU - Kittinger, John N.
AU - Hicks, Christina C.
AU - D'agata, Stephanie
AU - Huchery, Cindy
AU - Barnes, Michele L.
AU - Feary, David A.
AU - Williams, Ivor D.
AU - Kulbicki, Michel
AU - Vigliola, Laurent
AU - Wantiez, Laurent
AU - Edgar, Graham J.
AU - Stuart-Smith, Rick D.
AU - Sandin, Stuart A.
AU - Green, Alison L.
AU - Beger, Maria
AU - Friedlander, Alan M.
AU - Wilson, Shaun K.
AU - Brokovich, Eran
AU - Brooks, Andrew J.
AU - Cruz-Motta, Juan J.
AU - Booth, David J.
AU - Chabanet, Pascale
AU - Tupper, Mark
AU - Ferse, Sebastian C.A.
AU - Sumaila, U. Rashid
AU - Hardt, Marah J.
AU - Mouillot, David
TI - Meeting fisheries, ecosystem function, and biodiversity goals in a human
dominated world
T2 - Science
PY - 2020
SP - 307-311
VL - 368
DO - 10.1126/science.aax9412
AB - The worldwide decline of coral reefs necessitates targeting management solutions that can sustain not only reefs but also the livelihoods of the millions of people who depend on them. Yet little is known about the context in which different reef management tools can help to achieve multiple social and ecological goals. Due to non-linearities in the likelihood of achieving combined fisheries, ecological function, and biodiversity goals along a gradient of human pressure, relatively small changes in the context where management is implemented could have dramatic implications on whether these goals are likely to be met or not. Critically, marine reserves and fisheries restrictions could provide substantial conservation benefits to the majority of reefs for fisheries and ecological function, but not biodiversity goals.
ER -
