Differential recycling of coral and algal dissolved organic matter via the sponge loop
Laura Rix
Jasper M. de Goeij
Dick van Oevelen
Ulrich Struck
Fuad A. Al-Horani
Christian Wild
Malik Naumann
Sally Power
Abstract
1. Corals and macroalgae release large quantities of dissolved organic matter (DOM), one of the largest sources of organic matter produced on coral reefs. By rapidly taking up DOM and transforming it into particulate detritus, coral reef sponges are proposed to play a key role in transferring the energy and nutrients in DOM to higher trophic levels via the recently discovered sponge loop. DOM released by corals and algae differs in quality and composition, but the influence of these different DOM sources on recycling by the sponge loop has not been investigated.
2. Here, we used stable isotope pulse‐chase experiments to compare the processing of naturally sourced coral‐ and algal‐derived DOM by three Red Sea coral reef sponge species: Chondrilla sacciformis, Hemimycale arabica and Mycale fistulifera. Incubation experiments were conducted to trace 13C‐ and 15N‐enriched coral‐ and algal‐derived DOM into the sponge tissue and detritus. Incorporation of 13C into specific phospholipid‐derived fatty acids (PLFAs) was used to differentiate DOM assimilation within the sponge holobiont (i.e. the sponge host vs. its associated bacteria).
3. All sponges assimilated both coral‐ and algal‐derived DOM, but incorporation rates were significantly higher for algal‐derived DOM. The two DOM sources were also processed differently by the sponge holobiont. Algal‐derived DOM was incorporated into bacteria‐specific PLFAs at a higher rate while coral‐derived DOM was more readily incorporated into sponge‐specific PLFAs. A substantial fraction of the dissolved organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) assimilated by the sponges was subsequently converted into and released as particulate detritus (15–24% C and 27–49% N). However, algal‐derived DOM was released as detritus at a higher rate.
4. The higher uptake and transformation rates of algal‐ compared with coral‐derived DOM suggest that reef community phase shifts from coral to algal dominance may stimulate DOM cycling through the sponge loop with potential consequences for coral reef biogeochemical cycles and food webs.
Rix L., de Goeij J.M., van Oevelen D., Struck U., Al-Horani F.A., Wild C., Naumann M. and Power S. (2016) Differential recycling of coral and algal dissolved organic matter via the sponge loop. 31(3): 778-789. 10.1111/1365-2435.12758
@article{Rix2016,
Title = {Differential recycling of coral and algal dissolved organic matter via the sponge loop},
Author = {Rix, Laura and de Goeij, Jasper M. and van Oevelen, Dick and Struck, Ulrich and Al-Horani, Fuad A. and Wild, Christian and Naumann, Malik and Power, Sally},
Editor = {},
Year = {2016},
Pages = {778-789},
Volume = {31},
Doi = {10.1111/1365-2435.12758},
Abstract = {1. Corals and macroalgae release large quantities of dissolved organic matter (DOM), one of the largest sources of organic matter produced on coral reefs. By rapidly taking up DOM and transforming it into particulate detritus, coral reef sponges are proposed to play a key role in transferring the energy and nutrients in DOM to higher trophic levels via the recently discovered sponge loop. DOM released by corals and algae differs in quality and composition, but the influence of these different DOM sources on recycling by the sponge loop has not been investigated.
2. Here, we used stable isotope pulse‐chase experiments to compare the processing of naturally sourced coral‐ and algal‐derived DOM by three Red Sea coral reef sponge species: Chondrilla sacciformis, Hemimycale arabica and Mycale fistulifera. Incubation experiments were conducted to trace 13C‐ and 15N‐enriched coral‐ and algal‐derived DOM into the sponge tissue and detritus. Incorporation of 13C into specific phospholipid‐derived fatty acids (PLFAs) was used to differentiate DOM assimilation within the sponge holobiont (i.e. the sponge host vs. its associated bacteria).
3. All sponges assimilated both coral‐ and algal‐derived DOM, but incorporation rates were significantly higher for algal‐derived DOM. The two DOM sources were also processed differently by the sponge holobiont. Algal‐derived DOM was incorporated into bacteria‐specific PLFAs at a higher rate while coral‐derived DOM was more readily incorporated into sponge‐specific PLFAs. A substantial fraction of the dissolved organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) assimilated by the sponges was subsequently converted into and released as particulate detritus (15–24% C and 27–49% N). However, algal‐derived DOM was released as detritus at a higher rate.
4. The higher uptake and transformation rates of algal‐ compared with coral‐derived DOM suggest that reef community phase shifts from coral to algal dominance may stimulate DOM cycling through the sponge loop with potential consequences for coral reef biogeochemical cycles and food webs.},
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Rix, Laura
AU - de Goeij, Jasper M.
AU - van Oevelen, Dick
AU - Struck, Ulrich
AU - Al-Horani, Fuad A.
AU - Wild, Christian
AU - Naumann, Malik
AU - Power, Sally
TI - Differential recycling of coral and algal dissolved organic matter via the sponge loop
PY - 2016
SP - 778-789
VL - 31
DO - 10.1111/1365-2435.12758
AB - 1. Corals and macroalgae release large quantities of dissolved organic matter (DOM), one of the largest sources of organic matter produced on coral reefs. By rapidly taking up DOM and transforming it into particulate detritus, coral reef sponges are proposed to play a key role in transferring the energy and nutrients in DOM to higher trophic levels via the recently discovered sponge loop. DOM released by corals and algae differs in quality and composition, but the influence of these different DOM sources on recycling by the sponge loop has not been investigated.
2. Here, we used stable isotope pulse‐chase experiments to compare the processing of naturally sourced coral‐ and algal‐derived DOM by three Red Sea coral reef sponge species: Chondrilla sacciformis, Hemimycale arabica and Mycale fistulifera. Incubation experiments were conducted to trace 13C‐ and 15N‐enriched coral‐ and algal‐derived DOM into the sponge tissue and detritus. Incorporation of 13C into specific phospholipid‐derived fatty acids (PLFAs) was used to differentiate DOM assimilation within the sponge holobiont (i.e. the sponge host vs. its associated bacteria).
3. All sponges assimilated both coral‐ and algal‐derived DOM, but incorporation rates were significantly higher for algal‐derived DOM. The two DOM sources were also processed differently by the sponge holobiont. Algal‐derived DOM was incorporated into bacteria‐specific PLFAs at a higher rate while coral‐derived DOM was more readily incorporated into sponge‐specific PLFAs. A substantial fraction of the dissolved organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) assimilated by the sponges was subsequently converted into and released as particulate detritus (15–24% C and 27–49% N). However, algal‐derived DOM was released as detritus at a higher rate.
4. The higher uptake and transformation rates of algal‐ compared with coral‐derived DOM suggest that reef community phase shifts from coral to algal dominance may stimulate DOM cycling through the sponge loop with potential consequences for coral reef biogeochemical cycles and food webs.
ER -
